Max. Dude. Did you not read my comment?

No one is going to be dumb enough to believe your tripe.

Let it go, man. You’ve gone beyond being petty.

Dork.

First, for almost three years Max has been trying to peddle his nonsense about Tony Perkins being associated with David Duke and other white supremacists. In fact, he gets hopping mad that no one seems to pay attention when he repeats such scurrilous charges. The fact is that FRC has responded to that first claim about Duke back in 2005 and yet Max still repeats this lie. He also makes much ado about a speech before the CCC. It is true that when Perkins was a state legislator he spoke at lunch that was sponsored by that group. At the time he did not know of the groups racist agenda (be honest, have you ever heard of the “Council of Conservative Citizens?”). After he found out, he forcefully denounced the group. One question that Max never seems to ask is that if Tony Perkins is a racist, why do so many African-American churches and pastors support him?

Second, he claims that “Tony Perkins, has orchestrated the hacking of this post.” Get over yourself, Max. You’re not on a level where someone like Tony would take notice of you. My web editor Jared Bridges and I are the one who orchestrated this prank. We did it mostly because it would be fun and because we suspected you wouldn’t have a sense of humor (boy, were we right about that!). Also, “hacking” implies that we broke into your website rather than just changed a picture that you stole from our site.

Third, he says “In doing so, he has drawn greater attention to his links to and ideological support for white supremacists.” Stop and think about that for a second, Max. If your claims had any truth to them wouldn’t we try to avoid bringing attention to your article? Besides, since no one seems to have noticed what was going on it appears no one is reading your site anyway.

Fourth, he says, “The photo of Christopher Hitchens posing with the Family Research Council’s Witherspoon Fellows was scrubbed from FRC’s site today out of fear that I would link to it again.” It wasn’t “scrubbed” from our site. In fact, you are welcome to download a copy and post it on your site…if you ask nicely. All you had to do is ask, Max.

Fifth, he goes nuts when he says, “The Family Research Council is a paper tiger that fears me and employs juvenile pranks to attempt to silence me.” Was it a juvenile prank? Absolutely. And a pretty funny one, if I may say so myself. Also, how is linking to your posts (all four of them) an attempt to “silence” you? As for the charge of being a paper tiger, we just have one response: Meow.

The absolute best part of the post, though, is when he says, “Father forgive them for not knowing that I won’t stop bringing the pain.”

Why bring your daddy Sidney into this? And why should he forgive us? Oh well, I guess it doesn’t matter. We’ll be too busy hiding because Max is gonna Bring the Pain! Flee, flee, FRC, Max is gonna Bring the Pain!.

Dude, you are the biggest source of amusement I’ve had in years. Please, please keep it coming. You are a riot. Please bring all the pain to: 801 G Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001. We’re looking forward to it.

Please explain how they ‘hacked’ their own site not your post.
Freaking n00b.

And they ’scrubbed’ their image so you coudn’t leach bandwidth.
It’s bad form to do this. Like using your neighbors water hose to water your lawn.

Ask him how this internet thingy works.

Collin
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com